Kia Niro EV vs Volvo XC40 Recharge: Which Premium EV to Buy?

You’re standing in a showroom, keys to your gas guzzler still in your pocket, wondering which electric SUV will change your life. The price tags differ by nearly thirteen thousand dollars, yet both promise to end your relationship with gas stations forever. Here’s the tension that keeps buyers up at night: one vehicle delivers jaw-dropping cargo space and a warranty that outlasts most marriages, while the other rockets from zero to sixty in 4.3 seconds with Scandinavian luxury wrapped around every surface.

Keynote: Kia Niro EV vs Volvo XC40 Recharge

The Kia Niro EV vs Volvo XC40 Recharge comparison reveals a $14,195 price gap defining value versus luxury. Kia delivers 22.8 cubic feet cargo, 253-mile range, and 10-year warranty starting at $39,600. Volvo counters with 402-hp Twin Motor AWD, 200-kW fast charging, 293-mile Single Motor range, and Scandinavian luxury from $53,795.

Why This Match-Up Matters Right Now

You’re ready to go electric, but the showroom feels overwhelming. So many promises, so many price tags. The Kia Niro EV and Volvo EX40 (formerly XC40 Recharge) keep popping up in your research because they actually fit real life. Family errands, highway commutes, weekend adventures. One delivers unbeatable value and space; the other wraps you in premium power and polish. Both now tap into Tesla’s Supercharger network.

What You’ll Walk Away With

A crystal-clear sense of which SUV matches your budget, driving style, and daily routines. No fluff, no jargon. Just the honest trade-offs that help you choose with confidence. A test-drive checklist so you can feel the difference for yourself before signing anything.

The Quick Verdict: Which One Should You Pick?

If You Want Fuss-Free Value and Room to Breathe

Choose the Kia Niro EV when your budget is firm, your cargo needs are real (think Costco runs and airport trips), and a 10-year warranty gives you that warm, worry-free feeling. Starting around $39,600, the Niro EV offers 253 miles of EPA-rated range from its 64.8 kWh battery. You’ll find 22.8 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats, expanding to a generous 63.7 cubic feet when you fold them down. That’s enough room for a weekend camping trip or a month of groceries without playing Tetris.

The front-wheel-drive setup delivers 201 horsepower and a respectable 113 MPGe combined efficiency. Translation: your electricity bill stays reasonable while you haul real stuff. First-time EV buyers love the Niro because it doesn’t feel alien. It drives like a regular crossover, just quieter and smoother. Front legroom stretches to 41.5 inches, and rear passengers get 36.9 inches. Five adults fit comfortably for trips across town.

If You Crave Premium Punch and Highway Confidence

Choose the Volvo EX40 when you want faster charging, stronger acceleration, and that upscale Scandinavian vibe. Plus optional all-wheel drive for snow or rain. Starting near $53,795, the EX40 commands a premium, but it delivers experiences the Kia can’t match. The Single Motor rear-wheel-drive variant offers up to 293 miles of range from its larger 82 kWh battery pack. That’s forty more miles than the Niro, perfect for longer road trips.

Want thrills? The Twin Motor all-wheel-drive configuration unleashes 402 horsepower and 494 pound-feet of torque. Zero to sixty happens in 4.3 seconds. That’s sports-car territory wrapped in a family-friendly package. It’s the difference between getting there comfortably and getting there with a grin.

Price Reality: What Your Dollar Actually Buys

The Sticker Shock Breakdown

Kia Niro EV starts around $39,600. A friendlier entry point for first-time EV buyers. Volvo EX40 kicks off near $53,795. Positioned as a premium small SUV with luxury touches baked in. That’s a $14,195 difference right out of the gate.

Here’s what that price gap means in the real world. The money you save with the Kia could cover five years of insurance premiums. Or it could handle your home charging installation with cash left over for a vacation. Mid-tier trims push the gap even wider. A loaded Niro EV tops out around $47,000, while a fully equipped EX40 Twin Motor easily climbs past $60,000.

ModelBase MSRPMid-Tier Price
Kia Niro EV$39,600~$43,000
Volvo EX40 Single Motor$53,795~$56,000
Volvo EX40 Twin MotorN/A~$60,000+

The Long Game: Warranties, Incentives, and Hidden Perks

Kia’s 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty is industry-leading. Volvo offers 8 years/100,000 miles on the battery plus four years of free scheduled maintenance. Don’t forget federal tax credits, local utility rebates, and state incentives. Both qualify, so check your ZIP code. The full $7,500 federal EV tax credit can dramatically change your math, potentially bringing the Niro EV below $32,000 after incentives.

Over five years, the Kia loses about 50% of its value according to industry projections. The Volvo dips to roughly 56.7% residual value. Kia edges ahead slightly on resale, meaning you’ll recover more of your investment when it’s time to upgrade. But here’s the hidden truth: Volvo parts and authorized service typically cost more at dealerships. Kia’s service network is nearly three times larger, making appointments easier and cheaper. J.D. Power consistently ranks Kia first in three-year reliability, while Volvo sits 30th with 111 more problems per 100 vehicles.

Range, Battery, and Real-World Driving

How Far Can You Really Go?

Kia Niro EV: 64.8 kWh battery, 253-mile EPA range. Most drivers see 210 to 230 miles on the highway at 70 mph with heat or air conditioning running. City driving treats you better, often delivering the full 253 miles or more thanks to regenerative braking.

Volvo EX40 Single Motor: 82 kWh pack, up to 293-mile EPA estimate. Longer legs for road trips mean fewer charging stops between cities. Real-world highway range settles around 250 to 270 miles depending on speed and weather. Volvo EX40 Twin Motor: Dual motors and AWD cut range to 254 miles, but deliver 402 hp and exhilarating acceleration. The added power draws more energy, especially if you enjoy using all that instant torque.

ModelBattery SizeEPA RangeReal-World Highway
Kia Niro EV64.8 kWh253 miles210-230 miles
Volvo EX40 Single Motor82 kWh293 miles250-270 miles
Volvo EX40 Twin Motor82 kWh254 miles220-240 miles

The Kia achieves its 253 miles using a battery that’s 21% smaller than the Volvo’s. That’s superior efficiency at work. The Niro scores 126 MPGe in the city and 101 MPGe on the highway, landing at 113 MPGe combined. The Volvo Single Motor manages 106 MPGe combined, while the Twin Motor drops to 92 MPGe city and 79 MPGe highway. Translation: you’ll pay more to charge the Volvo each month.

Charging Speed: The Minutes That Matter

Kia: 10 to 80% in roughly 43 minutes on a 100 kW DC fast charger. Solid, but not lightning-quick. The Niro’s maximum charging rate peaks at 85 kW, which feels modest in 2025. Most highway rest stops offer 150 kW chargers, so you won’t use their full potential.

Volvo: 10 to 80% in approximately 28 minutes on a 200 kW charger. Faster turnarounds at highway pit stops. The Single Motor accepts up to 200 kW, while the Twin Motor tops out at 150 kW. That’s a fifteen-minute advantage over the Kia, perfect for grabbing lunch without anxiety.

Charging TypeKia Niro EVVolvo EX40 SMVolvo EX40 TM
DC Fast (10-80%)43 minutes28 minutes37 minutes
Level 2 (Home, 0-100%)7.5 hours8.0 hours8.0 hours
Peak DC Rate85 kW200 kW150 kW

Both support 11 kW Level 2 charging at home, filling overnight while you sleep. Plug in when you pull into the garage, and wake up to a full battery every morning. Home charging costs roughly $0.03 to $0.05 per mile depending on your local electricity rates.

But here’s a charging curve truth few mention: the Volvo’s 200 kW peak is short-lived. Real-world owners report the rate dropping quickly after 40% charge. One driver documented charging from 37% to 61% taking 18 minutes, with power falling from 71 kW to 56 kW. That’s far below the advertised peak, especially frustrating if you arrive at a charger with 50% battery remaining.

Charging Networks: Where You’ll Actually Plug In

Volvo drivers can use 17,800-plus Tesla Superchargers right now with the included NACS adapter. Kia drivers gained Supercharger access in 2025. Adapter required, so confirm availability at your dealership. Both vehicles also work with all CCS charging networks including Electrify America, EVgo, and ChargePoint. Verify station compatibility in your app before long trips. Download PlugShare to see real-time charger availability and user reviews.

Power and Performance: The Feel of the Drive

Acceleration: Merging, Passing, and That Grin Factor

Kia Niro EV: 201 hp, 0 to 60 mph in 7.1 seconds. Adequate for merging, calm for commuting. You won’t win traffic light drag races, but you’ll never feel unsafe entering a highway. The single front motor delivers smooth, linear power that feels refined rather than exciting.

Volvo EX40 Single Motor: 248 hp, 0 to 60 mph in 6.5 seconds. Perkier response, more engaging. The rear-wheel-drive setup adds a touch of sportiness that you’ll notice on twisty roads. Power delivery feels more eager than the Kia without being overwhelming.

Volvo EX40 Twin Motor: 402 hp, 0 to 60 mph in 4.3 seconds. Shockingly fast, sports-car thrills in an SUV body. Passengers literally gasp the first time you floor it. That instant torque from two motors pins everyone to their seats. This isn’t just quick for an electric SUV. It’s genuinely fast by any standard.

ModelHorsepower0-60 mphTorque
Kia Niro EV201 hp7.1 sec188 lb-ft
Volvo EX40 Single Motor248 hp6.5 sec310 lb-ft
Volvo EX40 Twin Motor402 hp4.3 sec494 lb-ft

Handling: Corners, Snow, and Everyday Confidence

The Kia feels steady and smooth. Perfect for relaxed drives, but won’t thrill you on winding roads. It rides on 17-inch wheels with higher-profile 55-series tires that prioritize comfort over grip. The front-wheel-drive layout feels predictable and safe. You’ll navigate grocery store parking lots and city streets with zero drama.

The Volvo’s rear-wheel-drive Single Motor offers more engaging dynamics. The Twin Motor’s all-wheel drive grips confidently in rain or snow. Wider 19-inch wheels (with optional 20-inch upgrades) and lower-profile tires deliver sharper turn-in and more feedback through the steering wheel. The EX40 pulled 0.84 G’s on the skidpad during testing versus the Niro’s 0.79 G’s. It completes the Motor Trend figure-eight test one full second quicker at 26.3 seconds versus 27.3 seconds.

Ground clearance tells another story. The Volvo offers 6.9 inches versus the Niro’s 5.9 inches. That extra inch matters on rough parking lots, steep driveways, or light trails. The EX40 also features bigger brake rotors: 13.6 inches up front and 13.4 inches in the rear versus the Niro’s 12-inch fronts and 11.2-inch rears. That translates to a 60-to-zero stopping distance of 118 feet for the Volvo compared to 132 feet for the Kia. Fourteen feet might save your life someday.

Space, Seats, and Family Practicality

Cargo Room: Groceries, Gear, and Weekend Hauls

Kia Niro EV: 22.8 cu ft behind the seats, expanding to 63.7 cu ft with the rear row folded. Roomy and family-friendly. You can fit four large suitcases standing upright, or a double stroller plus grocery bags without breaking a sweat. The wide opening and low loading lip make hauling heavy items surprisingly easy.

Volvo EX40: Just 16 cu ft seats-up, but competitive 57.5 to 63.7 cu ft seats-down. Plus a small frunk for extra storage. That front trunk holds charging cables and a duffle bag. The main cargo area feels cramped for daily errands compared to the Kia. Tall items might not fit without folding the seats.

DimensionKia Niro EVVolvo EX40
Cargo (seats up)22.8 cu ft16.0 cu ft
Cargo (seats down)63.7 cu ft57.5 cu ft
Front Legroom41.5 inches40.9 inches
Rear Legroom36.9 inches36.1 inches
Front Headroom40.5 inches37.6 inches

Passenger Comfort: Legroom and That Cozy Feel

Front seats: Kia offers 41.5 inches of legroom vs. Volvo’s 40.9 inches. Taller drivers find the Kia slightly more accommodating. The Niro also provides 40.5 inches of headroom compared to the Volvo’s 37.6 inches. If you’re over six feet tall, the Kia feels less claustrophobic.

Rear seats: Kia provides 36.9 inches vs. Volvo’s 36.1 inches. Both handle five adults comfortably for short trips under an hour. Longer journeys might feel tight in either vehicle if you’re hauling three adults in back. Materials: Volvo wraps you in plusher seats with optional wool upholstery. The cabin feels instantly more upscale the moment you sit down. Premium leather, real metal accents, and thoughtful Swedish design create an atmosphere that justifies the price gap. Kia focuses on clever, recycled materials and modern design. It’s attractive and functional, but clearly positioned a tier below in tactile luxury.

Tech, Safety, and the Features You Touch Every Day

Infotainment: Screens, Apps, and Voice Control

Kia: Dual panoramic displays, 10.3-inch touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto, plus OTA updates and available Digital Key 2.0. The screen responds quickly to touches and swipes. Menus make sense after five minutes of exploration. You can unlock and start the car using your smartphone, perfect for those times you forget your keys.

Volvo: Large portrait screen powered by Google Built-In (Maps, Assistant, Play Store). Native integration feels seamless and advanced. You can say “Hey Google, navigate to the nearest charger” and it just works. The system learns your preferences over time. Google Maps displays real-time traffic and charging station availability without extra subscriptions.

FeatureKia Niro EVVolvo EX40
Screen Size10.3 inches11+ inches (portrait)
Wireless CarPlayYesYes
Android AutoWiredNative Google
WiFi HotspotNoYes (standard)
OTA UpdatesYesYes

Driver-Assist and Convenience

Both include lane-keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, and automatic emergency braking. These systems work well in traffic, gently nudging you back into your lane and maintaining safe following distance. Kia’s Highway Driving Assist smooths long road trips with semi-autonomous lane centering. Engage it on the interstate and the Niro practically drives itself for miles at a time, though you must keep your hands on the wheel.

Volvo adds extra sensors, an optional 360-degree camera, and earns IIHS “Top Safety Pick” recognition consistently. The surround-view camera makes tight parking spots stress-free. Blind-spot monitoring with steering assist actively helps prevent lane-change accidents. The EX40’s safety reputation isn’t just marketing. It reflects decades of Volvo engineering obsessed with protecting occupants.

Safety Ratings and Recent Recalls

Volvo EX40 (XC40 Recharge lineage) holds strong IIHS small-overlap crash test results. Five-star ratings across the board give buyers confidence. Kia Niro EV: U.S. IIHS/NHTSA ratings show solid performance, though Volvo’s safety heritage runs deeper. Both vehicles protect occupants exceptionally well in crashes.

2025 recalls: Kia issued a recall for passenger-seat airbag wiring (dealer fix completed quickly). Volvo recalled certain models for rear-camera software (simple software update resolved the issue). Neither recall suggests systemic quality problems. Both companies addressed issues promptly and professionally.

Ownership Costs: The Long View Beyond the Sticker

Maintenance and Reliability

Both EVs have fewer moving parts, slashing traditional maintenance headaches. No oil changes, no transmission fluid, no spark plugs. You’ll replace tires, wiper blades, and cabin air filters. That’s basically it for the first 50,000 miles. Brake pads last far longer than gas cars thanks to regenerative braking doing most of the stopping work.

Volvo parts and service typically cost more at authorized dealerships. Expect to pay premium prices for any repairs after warranty expires. Kia’s widespread network makes appointments easier and cheaper. Nearly three times as many Kia dealers exist compared to Volvo locations. You’ll find service centers in smaller towns where Volvo has zero presence.

Cost CategoryKia Niro EV (5-Year)Volvo EX40 (5-Year)
Estimated Maintenance$1,500-$2,500$2,074-$6,287
Projected Depreciation~50% (~$20,000)~43% (~$23,000-$34,000)
Total Cost of Ownership~$55,000-$60,000~$73,575

J.D. Power surveys consistently rank Kia higher in initial quality and long-term dependability than Volvo. The data shows 80 fewer problems per 100 vehicles for Kia in recent studies. That reliability advantage compounds over years of ownership, saving you unexpected repair bills and frustrating dealership visits.

Efficiency: Getting the Most Out of Every Charge

The Kia Niro EV is typically more efficient (higher MPGe). Your monthly electricity bill will thank you. At the national average of $0.14 per kWh, driving 12,000 miles annually costs roughly $445 in the Niro versus $504 in the Volvo Single Motor. The Volvo’s bigger battery and more powerful motors draw more energy, especially in Twin Motor AWD trim. That gap widens to $630 annually for the Twin Motor configuration.

Over five years, the Kia saves you approximately $295 to $925 in electricity costs alone. Add in lower maintenance expenses and better warranty coverage, and the total cost of ownership advantage grows to $15,000 or more favoring the Kia.

Real Owner Experiences: What People Actually Say

What Kia Niro EV Owners Love

Affordability combined with impressive range for daily needs. One owner shared: “I charge twice a week and never think about range anxiety. The 253 miles is perfect for my 40-mile commute plus weekend errands.” Practical cargo space and comfortable ride quality make it perfect for first-time EV buyers who want a familiar, non-intimidating feel.

The warranty provides genuine peace of mind. Knowing major drivetrain components are covered for ten years or 100,000 miles lets you sleep soundly. No surprise $8,000 battery replacement bills lurking in your future. The Kia’s efficiency impresses daily. Owners frequently report exceeding EPA estimates in city driving, sometimes seeing 260 to 270 miles of range on a full charge.

What Volvo EX40 Owners Appreciate

Premium interior materials create a calmer, more upscale driving environment. The seats feel like luxury furniture. Every surface you touch radiates quality. Scandinavian design feels refreshingly different from mainstream crossovers. Twin Motor’s thrilling acceleration surprises everyone. It’s the difference between getting there comfortably and getting there with a grin.

One Twin Motor owner described it perfectly: “I’ve terrified every passenger with the acceleration. Nobody expects a family SUV to move like this.” The faster DC charging genuinely matters on road trips. Those saved minutes add up over hundreds of miles. Arriving at a charger knowing you’ll be back on the highway in under thirty minutes reduces travel stress significantly.

Honest Complaints You Should Know

Kia: Some wish for faster charging speeds and an AWD option. The 85 kW maximum feels limiting when competitors offer 150 kW or more. Winter driving in snow-belt states would benefit from all-wheel drive. The front-wheel-drive setup can spin wheels on icy hills.

Volvo: Higher price tag, smaller day-to-day cargo space, and occasional highway road noise. That 16 cubic feet seats-up forces compromises during grocery runs. Wind noise at 70 mph intrudes more than expected in a premium vehicle. The ride quality over rough pavement can feel jittery despite the luxury positioning.

Your Final Pick: Which EV Fits Your Life?

Choose the Kia Niro EV If You…

Need to stretch your budget while going fully electric. Every dollar counts. Prioritize day-to-day practicality: big cargo space, comfortable seating, easy loading lips. Want a 10-year warranty for peace of mind and mostly commute, school-run, or shop locally.

You’re a rational buyer who values utility over badges. You want the best overall value per dollar spent. You don’t need to impress anyone. You just want reliable, efficient transportation that saves money compared to your old gas SUV. You’ll appreciate the superior front legroom and headroom if you’re tall. You make frequent Costco runs or haul sports equipment regularly.

Choose the Volvo EX40 If You…

Crave that premium feel and can afford the higher price without stress. Want faster charging, optional all-wheel drive, and stronger acceleration for highway confidence or snowy weather. Appreciate Scandinavian design and value included maintenance coverage plus advanced safety features.

You’re someone who enjoys the driving experience beyond basic transportation. The feel of premium materials matters to you. You smile when you press the accelerator and feel that instant torque. You’re willing to pay more for better dynamics, shorter braking distances, and that upscale cabin atmosphere. You prioritize driving engagement over maximum cargo space.

The Honest Bottom Line

Both deliver reliable electric driving without compromise for most families. Your choice comes down to budget priorities vs. luxury preferences. Neither is a wrong answer. Either way, you’re making a smart move toward cleaner transportation and quieter commutes. You’ll save thousands in fuel costs over the years. You’ll never smell gasoline on your hands again. You’ll reduce your carbon footprint significantly.

The Kia maximizes value and practicality. The Volvo maximizes performance and prestige. Both will get you where you need to go with zero tailpipe emissions. Both qualify for federal incentives. Both offer excellent safety ratings. Your final decision should reflect which attributes matter most to your daily life.

Conclusion: Your Test-Drive Plan and Next Steps

Schedule back-to-back drives on the same day. Note ride quality, seat comfort, visibility, and cabin noise. Pay attention to how each vehicle makes you feel emotionally, not just logically. Does one put a smile on your face? Does the other feel more relaxing?

Fast-charge each once: time the 10 to 80% climb and watch how the taper behaves. Arrive at the charging station with similar battery levels for fair comparison. Notice which vehicle’s charging curve feels more predictable. Check if the displayed charging time matches reality.

Open every bin: measure stroller or box fit, check loading-lip height, and test rear-seat folding mechanisms. Bring actual items you haul regularly. See if your daughter’s hockey bag fits without contorting it. Confirm your golf clubs or camping gear will travel comfortably.

Confirm recall work, software version, and NACS adapter availability at the dealership before you sign. Ask about pending updates. Verify the included charging cable meets your needs. Check if home charging installation is included or offered at a discount.

One Last Nudge

Trust your gut. The right EV is the one that makes you excited to unplug from gas stations forever. Take your time, ask questions, and remember: you’re not just buying a car. You’re investing in how you’ll feel every single morning when you grab the keys. The best EV is the one that fits your life so well, you forget it’s electric.

Volvo XC40 Recharge vs Kia Niro EV (FAQs)

How much more expensive is Volvo XC40 Recharge than Kia Niro EV?

The Volvo EX40 starts at $53,795 compared to the Kia Niro EV’s $39,600 base price. That’s a $14,195 difference at entry level. When you compare mid-tier trims, the gap often widens to $15,000 or more. This price premium buys you faster charging (200 kW vs 85 kW), more powerful performance options, and luxury cabin materials.

But you’re sacrificing cargo space and a longer warranty. The Kia’s 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain coverage crushes Volvo’s 4-year/50,000-mile plan. Over five years of ownership, the total cost gap including depreciation, maintenance, and electricity can reach $15,000 to $18,000 favoring the Kia.

Which has better range: XC40 Recharge or Niro EV?

The Volvo EX40 Single Motor edges ahead with up to 293 miles of EPA-estimated range versus the Kia Niro EV’s 253 miles. That’s a 40-mile advantage on paper. However, the Volvo achieves this using a much larger 82 kWh battery compared to the Niro’s 64.8 kWh pack.

The Kia is actually more efficient, scoring 113 MPGe combined versus the Volvo’s 106 MPGe. Real-world highway range at 70 mph narrows the gap significantly. Most Niro owners see 210 to 230 miles, while EX40 drivers report 250 to 270 miles. If you choose the Volvo Twin Motor AWD for its 402 horsepower, range drops to just 254 miles, barely edging the Kia.

Does Volvo XC40 Recharge charge faster than Niro EV?

Yes, dramatically faster. The Volvo EX40 Single Motor accepts up to 200 kW DC fast charging and can go from 10% to 80% in approximately 28 minutes under ideal conditions. The Twin Motor version tops out at 150 kW and takes about 37 minutes for the same charge.

The Kia Niro EV maxes out at just 85 kW, requiring 43 minutes to reach 80% from 10%. That’s a 15-minute disadvantage per charging stop. On long road trips, this difference adds up quickly. However, real-world Volvo owners report the charging curve tapers aggressively after 40% state of charge, sometimes dropping below 70 kW. The Kia’s slower but steadier curve can feel more predictable for trip planning.

Is Kia Niro EV warranty better than Volvo?

Absolutely. The Kia Niro EV includes an industry-leading 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty that covers electric motors, battery, and major drivetrain components. Kia also provides a 5-year/60,000-mile basic warranty.

Volvo offers just 4 years/50,000 miles for both basic and powertrain coverage, though battery coverage extends to 8 years/100,000 miles. Volvo does include four years of complimentary scheduled maintenance, which is nice. But Kia’s powertrain warranty extends six full years and 50,000 miles beyond Volvo’s coverage.

For long-term peace of mind, the Kia dominates. J.D. Power ranks Kia first in three-year reliability while Volvo sits 30th with 111 more problems per 100 vehicles.

Which has more cargo space: Niro EV or XC40 Recharge?

The Kia Niro EV wins decisively. It offers 22.8 cubic feet behind the rear seats versus the Volvo EX40’s cramped 16.0 cubic feet. That’s 42% more day-to-day cargo capacity. With rear seats folded, the Niro provides 63.7 cubic feet compared to the Volvo’s 57.5 to 63.7 cubic feet depending on measurement method.

The Niro also features a lower loading lip height and wider rear opening, making it easier to load bulky items. The Volvo counters with a small front trunk (frunk) for storing charging cables and a gym bag. For families doing grocery runs, Costco hauls, or hauling sports equipment, the Kia’s superior cargo volume makes daily life noticeably easier. If you regularly transport large items, the Niro is the clear choice.

Leave a Comment